Sort by:

Language
harrietjccooper97

over 1 year ago

Age range24 - 31
Skin typesSensitive skin
A bit disappointing 

I was really excited to try this product after having success with some other glossier products. But overall it’s left me feeling that glossier is a bit hit or miss as a brand. The serum quite literally feels like it’s going nothing for my skin. It’s nice to apply, drys down really well but other than that it does not feel like it’s doing any of the promised blowy-ness it says on the website.  Really disappointing 

450

ssaddest

almost 2 years ago

- TESTER

Age range24 - 31
Skin typesDry skin, Acne, Sensitive skin, Combined skin, Dehydrated skin, Breakouts (spotty skin), Eczema
she’s cute but she’s not always giving

Futuredew has been one product I’ve never been 100% sure about. I go from loving it to hating it the next minute. The products payoff is divine, it makes your skin look glowy and naturally lit from within and pops on the natural high points of your face. However, the formula does not smell good at all, it’s very chemically and I sometimes find it oddly tacky on my face when it feels like it should just be smooth? I do like it and I’ve gone back to purchase my second bottle after over year of not using. I just think that you need to be mindful when using as a little goes a long way and I personally think it works best on no makeup/minimal makeup days just to make you feel a little more confident. I don’t think it’s a product you need in your makeup bag but it would be a welcome addition if you’re into the glowy, glazed, glass skin looks.

566

casper-kool

over 1 year ago

- TESTER

Age range24 - 31
Skin typesCombined skin, Acne, Pigment spots
Is this a good charlotte tilbury dupe?

I’m a hardcore charlotte tilbury fan and i’m in love with the Hollywood filter. However the product is quite expensive and I was wondering if this is a good dupe? I want something that gives a good glow to the face without looking greasy. And also gives a more even coverage to get rid of hyperpigmentation. 

312